1 week ago
Kerala's Political Wheel Turns as Solar Shadows Meet ED Scrutiny
Oommen Chandy was Kerala’s chief minister when a major solar controversy began.
The allegations remained a political issue for many years.
Chandy answered questions before a commission created by his own government.
Pinarayi Vijayan’s government later brought the commission’s report before the Assembly.
The issue was also used during the 2021 election campaign.
Chandy was eventually cleared of the charges.
Now, an investigation involving Vijayan’s daughter has created a new political controversy.
Vijayan says he has nothing to fear, while the CPI(M) plans to challenge the central agency politically.
The solar controversy placed former Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy under sustained political pressure from 2014 onward.
Chandy appeared before a judicial commission established by his own government and gave evidence about the allegations.
Pinarayi Vijayan’s government tabled the Justice G. Sivarajan Commission report in a special Assembly session in 2017.
Chandy was later cleared of the charges, followed by a broad public outpouring after his death.
A Directorate of Enforcement investigation involving Vijayan’s daughter, Veena Vijayan, has renewed political debate over alleged hawala-linked transactions.
- Who
- Former Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Chandy’s accuser Saritha S. Nair, and Vijayan’s daughter Veena Vijayan are central figures.
- What
- A past solar controversy involving Chandy is being compared with the Directorate of Enforcement investigation involving Veena Vijayan.
- Where
- Kerala, including the state Assembly and Thiruvananthapuram.
- When
- The solar allegations became prominent from 2014; the commission report was discussed on November 9, 2017; the current investigation is described as ongoing.
- Why
- The comparison arises because both controversies have become major political issues, while the current investigation has renewed debate over Vijayan’s political defense.
Investigative Concerns
Political Defenses
Allegations and transactions
Investigative Concerns
The Directorate of Enforcement’s latest findings and its description of certain transactions as allegedly involving hawala have increased political pressure around the case.
Political Defenses
Pinarayi Vijayan maintains that he has nothing to fear and that his hands are clean.
Role of central agency
Investigative Concerns
The investigation is presented as requiring scrutiny of the transactions and the allegations surrounding them.
Political Defenses
The CPI(M) state leadership plans to portray the investigation as part of a broader political battle against the central agency.
Political consequences
Investigative Concerns
If the allegations gain legal traction, the CPI(M) could face a major political crisis in Kerala.
Political Defenses
The article leaves open whether Vijayan will ultimately emerge from the controversy without lasting political damage, as Chandy did after being cleared.
Key facts
- Solar controversy
- Allegations raised by solar case accused Saritha S. Nair placed Oommen Chandy under political pressure from 2014 onward.
- Judicial inquiry
- Chandy appeared before a judicial commission appointed by his own government and gave evidence.
- Assembly session
- Pinarayi Vijayan convened a special one-day Assembly session on November 9, 2017, to table and discuss the Justice G. Sivarajan Commission report.
- Election relevance
- The solar issue continued to feature in the 2021 Kerala Assembly election campaign.
- Later outcome
- Chandy was eventually cleared of the charges described in the article.
- Current investigation
- The Directorate of Enforcement is investigating matters involving Veena Vijayan.
- Political response
- The CPI(M) state leadership is preparing to confront the Directorate of Enforcement politically.









