Archive · 23 May 2025
High Court Fines Petitioner for Presenting Wrong Facts
Imagine someone filed a complaint with the court about a test paper being leaked.
This person, who works in accounting, claimed he wasn't involved.
However, the court found that he wasn't telling the truth.
The court decided to dismiss his complaint because he presented incorrect information.
The court also made him pay a fine as a consequence for the misleading information.
Basically, the court didn't believe his story, so it rejected his complaint and made him pay a fine.
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition regarding the 2021 sub-inspector exam paper leak.
The petition was filed by Purshottam Dadhich, an assistant accounts officer.
The petitioner claimed he wasn't named in the FIR but was later accused of buying the leaked paper.
The court found the petitioner presented 'wrong facts' and dismissed the petition.
The court imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioner.
- Who
- The Rajasthan High Court fined Purshottam Dadhich, an assistant accounts officer, after dismissing his petition.
- What
- The court dismissed a petition and fined the petitioner for presenting wrong facts related to an SI exam paper leak.
- When
- Thursday, the court issued the order.
- Where
- The Rajasthan High Court in Jaipur.
- Why
- The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner presented incorrect information.
- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Petitioner
- Purshottam Dadhich
- Case
- SI exam paper leak
- Fine
- Rs 50,000
- Reason for Fine
- Presenting "wrong facts"