2 days ago
Revised CBFC Film Guidelines Spark Debate Over Censorship
India has issued updated rules for checking films before they are shown publicly.
The rules say films should not promote communal, anti-scientific or anti-national ideas.
They also say films should not harm India’s friendly relationships with other countries.
Many people online are worried that these rules could let officials remove too much from movies.
Some critics think the rules may be used unfairly against films that the government dislikes.
Others focus on the difference between certifying a film and censoring its scenes.
People also connected the rules to Salman Khan’s upcoming film Matrubhoomi.
However, there was no reported official decision about that film.
The debate is about how to balance creative freedom with limits on publicly shown films.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting issued revised film-certification guidelines on September 16 under Section 5B(2) of the Cinematograph Act.
The guidelines address content described as communal, obscurantist, anti-scientific or anti-national, along with portrayals affecting friendly relations with foreign states.
The changes have prompted online criticism over whether the Central Board of Film Certification is expanding from certification into censorship.
Some users alleged the rules could be applied selectively or with political bias, while others defended the need for regulatory limits.
Social-media speculation connected the changes to Salman Khan’s upcoming film Matrubhoomi, but no official CBFC decision on that film was reported.
- Who
- The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Central Board of Film Certification, filmmakers and audiences.
- What
- Revised guidelines for film certification have triggered debate over censorship, creative freedom and possible selective enforcement.
- Where
- India, under the country’s film-certification system.
- When
- The revised guidelines were issued on September 16; the articles do not specify the year.
- Why
- The guidelines set limits on certain forms of content, while critics fear they may expand the CBFC’s role or be applied selectively.
Critics of the revised guidelines
Regulatory rationale
Certification versus censorship
Critics of the revised guidelines
Critics argue that the Central Board of Film Certification should certify films rather than decide which scenes must be removed, and some describe the changes as censorship.
Regulatory rationale
The guidelines are presented as a certification framework operating under the Cinematograph Act’s statutory limits on content and public exhibition.
Application of the rules
Critics of the revised guidelines
Some users fear the rules will be applied selectively, with propaganda films treated differently from films officials do not want audiences to see.
Regulatory rationale
The articles do not report an official response addressing those allegations, but the framework identifies content and national interests that certification authorities must consider.
Creative freedom and public limits
Critics of the revised guidelines
Critics say the rules could restrict filmmakers and documentary makers, with some advocating uncensored releases on platforms beyond government control.
Regulatory rationale
The guidelines seek to prevent content viewed as communal, obscurantist, anti-scientific or anti-national and content that could strain friendly relations with foreign states.
Key facts
- Issuing authority
- Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
- Film-certification body
- Central Board of Film Certification
- Legal basis
- Section 5B(2) of the Cinematograph Act
- Issued
- September 16
- Covered content
- Communal, obscurantist, anti-scientific and anti-national attitudes
- Foreign-relations provision
- Films should not strain India’s friendly relations with foreign states
- Public exhibition
- Films intended for public exhibition in India require CBFC certification
Quotes
An anonymous social-media user
A social-media user criticizing the CBFC’s role and advocating uncensored documentary releases.
“They won't follow this for propaganda movies. This is only for the movies they don't want people to see. Indian cinema is as good as dead.”
deccanchronicle.com
“Going to be followed very selectively and with extreme bias. Not going to add to this.”
deccanchronicle.com
Sources
Related news
India Revises Film Certification Rules, Prompting Censorship Backlash
India Revises CBFC Rules on Violence, Drugs and Film Ratings
Films Depicting Drugs Must Now Carry Anti-Drug Warnings
India Reconstitutes CBFC With New 18-Member Committee Amid Certification Debate
India Mandates Anti-Drug Warnings in Films Under Revised Rules
CBFC Meets After Six Years, Seeks Revising Panel Details
Ricky Kej Backs Clearer Film Ratings Over Adult Content Cuts
