Archive · 25 Jul 2026
SBI Ordered to Refund Rs 1.26 Lakh for Unauthorized Credit Card Deductions
A man named Rupinder Singh from Yamuna Nagar had a savings account with the State Bank of India (SBI) and a credit card issued by SBI Cards.
He claimed he never activated the credit card or used it for any transactions.
However, starting in February 2022, SBI began deducting money from his savings account towards credit card dues.
In August 2022, he discovered two large transactions made in Mumbai that he believed were unauthorized.
He complained to the bank, but they did not respond.
He then took his case to the Haryana District Consumer Commission.
The commission found that SBI and SBI Cards did not provide any evidence to show that the credit card was activated or that the transactions were authorized.
They also noted that the bank deducted only partial amounts from his savings account instead of the full outstanding amount.
The commission ordered SBI to refund Rs 1.26 lakh and pay Rs 11,000 in compensation for mental agony and litigation costs.
This case highlights the importance of banks maintaining proper records and investigating fraud complaints promptly.
Rupinder Singh from Yamuna Nagar claimed he never activated his SBI credit card or linked it to any online payment platform.
SBI began deducting money from his savings account towards credit card dues starting in February 2022.
In August 2022, Singh discovered two large transactions made in Mumbai that he believed were unauthorized.
The Haryana District Consumer Commission found SBI and SBI Cards liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices.
The commission ordered SBI to refund Rs 1.26 lakh and pay Rs 11,000 in compensation for mental agony and litigation costs.
- Who
- Rupinder Singh, a resident of Yamuna Nagar, and State Bank of India (SBI)
- What
- SBI was ordered to refund Rs 1.26 lakh and pay Rs 11,000 in compensation for unauthorized deductions from an inactive credit card.
- When
- The judgment was delivered on July 15.
- Where
- The case was heard by the Haryana District Consumer Commission.
- Why
- The commission found SBI and SBI Cards liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices.
Complainant's View
SBI's View
Activation of Credit Card
Complainant's View
The complainant claims he never activated the credit card or linked it to any online payment platform.
SBI's View
SBI claims the complainant activated the card by generating a PIN and using it for transactions.
Authentication of Transactions
Complainant's View
The complainant alleges the transactions were unauthorized and the bank failed to investigate.
SBI's View
SBI asserts the transactions were authenticated through CVV and OTP and were genuine.
Auto-Debit Mandate
Complainant's View
The complainant denies opting for an auto-debit mandate.
SBI's View
SBI claims the complainant accepted the auto-debit mandate for payment of outstanding dues.
- Complainant
- Rupinder Singh
- Bank
- State Bank of India (SBI)
- Credit Card Issuer
- SBI Cards and Payment Services
- Amount Refunded
- Rs 1.26 lakh
- Compensation Awarded
- Rs 11,000
- Date of Judgment
- July 15
- Disputed Transactions
- Rs 40,849.60 and Rs 18,777.50
- Location of Transactions
- Mumbai