Archive · 7 Oct 2026
Moscow Format Talks End Without Statement Amid Afghan-Pakistani Rift
Countries met in Moscow to discuss Afghanistan, but Afghanistan and Pakistan disagreed about how to describe terrorism in a planned statement.
Afghanistan’s representatives said the draft linked their country with terrorism too often.
Pakistan’s envoy said attacks from Afghan soil were a serious problem and accused the Taliban authorities of supporting them.
Afghanistan’s foreign minister criticised Pakistan but said the neighbours should talk to solve their problems.
Russia said the meeting group could keep working even without an agreed statement.
Russia also offered to help if both countries asked.
A commentary on the meeting says the forum should pay more attention to people’s rights and inclusive government in Afghanistan.
It points to another declaration from a conference in Cambridge that calls for rights, representation, and an Afghan-led political process.
The articles also say the Moscow meeting is intended to coordinate regional cooperation, not settle disputes between the two neighbours.
The eighth Moscow Format consultations ended without a joint statement after Afghan and Pakistani delegates disagreed over terrorism-related wording.
Afghan representatives objected to references they said placed Afghanistan too often in a terrorist context; Pakistan accused the Taliban authorities of backing attacks from Afghan soil.
Pakistan’s envoy said Islamabad sought regional peace through diplomatic engagement, while Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi criticised Pakistan’s actions and called for dialogue.
Russia said the forum could continue without a joint statement, offered to assist de-escalation if both sides requested it, and warned against NATO military infrastructure in the region.
An accompanying analysis says Afghanistan’s rights and inclusive governance are receiving less attention in the Moscow Format, and highlights a separate Cambridge declaration calling for broad representation and an Afghan-led political process.
- Who
- Delegations from Afghanistan and Pakistan disagreed at the eighth Moscow Format consultations, attended by regional countries and guests.
- What
- The meeting concluded without a joint statement because of disagreement over terrorism-related language.
- When
- Monday, October 6; the reports identify the meeting as the eighth edition.
- Where
- Moscow, Russia.
- Why
- Afghan representatives objected to the draft’s references linking Afghanistan with terrorism, amid strained Afghanistan-Pakistan relations.
Afghan position
Pakistani position
Terrorism-related wording
Afghan position
Afghan representatives objected that the draft mentioned Afghanistan too often in a terrorist context and said the wording was unacceptable.
Pakistani position
Pakistan’s envoy said terrorism emanating from Afghan soil had increased and alleged that the Taliban authorities actively supported the attacks.
Handling bilateral tensions
Afghan position
Amir Khan Muttaqi criticised Pakistan’s use of military pressure and other forms of leverage, and said disputes should be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy.
Pakistani position
Mohammad Sadiq said Pakistan had pursued political and diplomatic engagement and described its approach as responsible and aimed at regional peace.
What the regional forum should address
Afghan position
Afghan representatives resisted language they considered unfairly associating Afghanistan with terrorism.
Pakistani position
Pakistan’s statement placed terrorism among the central problems facing Afghanistan and the region. Russia said the forum coordinates regional cooperation rather than resolving bilateral disputes.
- Meeting
- Eighth edition of the Moscow Format consultations on Afghanistan.
- Outcome
- Participants did not adopt a joint statement.
- Dispute
- Afghan representatives objected to terrorism-related references; Pakistan said terrorism emanating from Afghan soil was a central concern.
- Pakistan’s position
- Special envoy Mohammad Sadiq said Pakistan sought regional peace and had pursued political and diplomatic engagement.
- Afghan response
- Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi criticised Pakistan’s actions and said the neighbours’ problems could be addressed through dialogue and diplomacy.
- Russia’s position
- Envoy Zamir Kabulov said the format could continue without a statement and offered Russian assistance if both sides requested it.
- Regional participation
- The reports list Afghanistan, China, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, with Belarus and Egypt as guests.
- Alternative proposal discussed
- The commentary highlights a Cambridge Declaration calling for rights and representation for women, minorities and communities, and an Afghan-led political process.