1 hr ago
Drishyam 3 Criticizes Vijay’s Justice-Free Family Protection
The review says Drishyam 3 does not bring the old crime to a proper ending.
Vijay’s family was involved in a young man’s death, but they still face no consequences.
The writer thinks the movies make Vijay seem like a hero for protecting his family.
They say this ignores the pain of the dead boy’s mother and the damage to Vijay’s daughters.
In the new film, Vijay uses religion and public emotions as part of his plan.
The review compares this to political leaders who use similar tactics.
It argues that Vijay’s family does not seem truly safe or happy.
The writer believes the film should question his actions instead of celebrating them.
The review argues that Drishyam 3 leaves the decade-old killing unresolved and its perpetrators without consequences.
It says the films frame Vijay Salgaonkar as a devoted family man while overlooking the harm done to the victim’s family.
In the new film, Vijay is criticized for using religion and manipulating a mob to protect his family.
The review says Vijay’s daughters remain traumatized and fearful despite his belief that he has saved them.
The author presents Vijay as a reflection of political leaders who exploit religion and public sentiment to get their way.
- Who
- The review focuses on Vijay Salgaonkar, his family, and the people seeking justice for the young man who died.
- What
- An opinion review criticizes Drishyam 3 for portraying Vijay’s schemes as heroic while leaving the crime unresolved.
- Where
- In theatres; the article does not specify a location.
- When
- Drishyam 3 was released in theatres the weekend before the review was published; the original film appeared in 2015.
- Why
- The author argues that the film overlooks the victim’s family, the daughters’ trauma, and the consequences of Vijay’s actions.
The review’s critique
Vijay’s self-justification as described
Protecting the family
The review’s critique
The author argues that Vijay’s actions harm others and leave his daughters traumatized, so his family is not truly saved.
Vijay’s self-justification as described
Vijay believes he has saved his family from imprisonment and pushes them to move on.
Justice for the victim
The review’s critique
The review says the film neglects the dead young man’s family and treats avoiding punishment as a victory.
Vijay’s self-justification as described
Vijay’s priority, as portrayed in the review, is preventing his family from being imprisoned.
Key facts
- Film
- Drishyam 3: The Conclusion
- Review’s central criticism
- The story celebrates Vijay’s protection of his family while failing to address justice for the young man who died.
- Original film
- The first film was released in 2015.
- Crime described
- Vijay’s wife and older daughter accidentally kill Sam after he sexually harasses and blackmails the daughter.
- Vijay’s tactics
- The review says he forges evidence, coaches his family to lie, and uses religion and public sentiment.
- Family impact
- The review describes the daughters as traumatized and the family as living in fear.
- Unresolved outcome
- According to the review, the decade-old crime remains unsolved and those responsible are not punished.
Sources
Related news
Drishyam 3: Ajay Devgn Faces Goa Police in Finale
Drishyam: The Conclusion Delivers Vijay Salgaonkar’s Tense Finale
Drishyam 3 delivers a morally complex, satisfying conclusion
Drishyam: The Conclusion Closes Vijay Salgaonkar’s Story
Drishyam: The Conclusion Arrives Amid Record Advance Bookings
Drishyam The Conclusion Delivers Suspense Despite Uneven Pacing
Drishyam 3 Crosses ₹200 Crore in India, Reaches ₹341 Crore Worldwide
Tabu Celebrates Three Decades of Ninne Pelladatha's Enduring Romance
Drishyam The Conclusion Eyes Monday Test After Strong Weekend
Drishyam: The Conclusion Nears Rs 200 Crore at Domestic Box Office
