Archive · 5 Sep 2026
ITAT Protects Genuine F&O Profits From Unsupported Bogus-Entry Claims
A tax officer suspected that Rakhi Vipul Jogi’s trading profits were not real.
The officer relied on information from an investigation department about possible misuse of a commodities exchange.
Jogi had bought and sold commodities and reported a profit of ₹8.07 lakh.
The officer called that profit an accommodation entry and also questioned a property purchase.
An appeals authority cancelled the reassessment because there was no clear evidence connecting Jogi or her broker to wrongdoing.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal agreed with that decision.
It said investigation reports can prompt a review, but tax officers must independently check the facts.
They must show a real link between the taxpayer and any alleged market manipulation.
The Mumbai ITAT ruled that genuine F&O and commodity profits cannot be deemed bogus solely from an investigative report.
Rakhi Vipul Jogi reported total income of ₹7.36 lakh for Assessment Year 2012-13.
The Assessing Officer treated her ₹8.07 lakh commodity-trading profit as an accommodation entry and added estimated commission of ₹24,225.
The officer also treated Jogi’s ₹50 lakh property purchase as an unexplained investment.
The tribunal held that reassessment requires independent verification and a direct connection between alleged manipulation and the taxpayer.
- Who
- The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Revenue, Assessing Officer, and taxpayer Rakhi Vipul Jogi.
- What
- The tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld cancellation of a reassessment treating trading profits as unexplained income.
- When
- The case concerned Assessment Year 2012-13; the assessment was reopened in 2019.
- Where
- The ruling was issued by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai and involved trading through the National Multi-Commodity Exchange.
- Why
- The tribunal found that authorities had not independently established a direct link between Jogi and alleged manipulation or an identified shell entity.
Tax Authorities’ Position
Tribunal’s Finding
Validity of the trading profits
Tax Authorities’ Position
The Assessing Officer relied on investigation-wing information about alleged misuse of the National Multi-Commodity Exchange and treated Jogi’s profit as an accommodation entry.
Tribunal’s Finding
The tribunal found that the authorities had not produced meaningful evidence linking Jogi or her broker to an alleged shell entity or manipulation.
Use of investigative information
Tax Authorities’ Position
The investigation-wing information was used as the basis for reopening the assessment.
Tribunal’s Finding
Such information can justify reopening a case, but the Assessing Officer must apply independent judgment and establish a direct, live connection with the taxpayer.
Additional tax adjustments
Tax Authorities’ Position
The Assessing Officer added estimated commission and treated the ₹50 lakh property purchase as an unexplained investment.
Tribunal’s Finding
Because the reassessment itself was invalid, the related additions and calculations could not stand.
- Declared income
- ₹7.36 lakh for Assessment Year 2012-13
- Commodity purchases
- ₹2.77 crore through broker Star Commodities
- Commodity sales
- ₹2.782 crore
- Reported trading profit
- ₹8.07 lakh
- Estimated commission added
- ₹24,225
- Property investment questioned
- ₹50 lakh
- Key legal principle
- Investigation-wing information may support reopening, but the Assessing Officer must independently establish a live nexus to the taxpayer.