Archive · 5 Oct 2026
Orissa High Court Upholds Divorce in Eroded Marriage
A husband asked the Orissa High Court to undo a divorce granted to his wife.
He said the claims against him had not been proved and that he wanted the marriage to continue.
His wife’s lawyer said she had provided evidence of physical and mental cruelty.
The judges considered the incidents together and said they showed ongoing problems, not just one argument.
They said trust and other important parts of the relationship had substantially eroded.
The couple had also told the court they wanted to end the marriage.
The judges stressed that wanting to separate alone was not the reason for the divorce.
They upheld the divorce because they found cruelty had been established by the evidence.
The Orissa High Court upheld a family court’s January 27, 2024, divorce decree granted to a wife on grounds of cruelty.
The husband appealed, arguing that the wife’s allegations were not sufficiently proved and that he wanted to continue the marriage.
The wife’s lawyer said she had provided evidence of physical and mental cruelty that made continuing the marriage impossible.
The High Court found the evidence showed a continuing course of discord, rather than a single quarrel or isolated disagreement.
The bench said mutual confidence had substantially eroded and declined to require the wife to resume the relationship.
- Who
- A husband and wife; the appeal was heard by Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Chittaranjan Dash.
- What
- The Orissa High Court refused to overturn a family court’s divorce decree on grounds of cruelty.
- When
- The family court granted the divorce on January 27, 2024; the High Court order was dated October 1. The year of the High Court order is not stated.
- Where
- The Orissa High Court heard the appeal. The couple had lived in Visakhapatnam and Hyderabad, and the wife went to Rayagada after leaving the matrimonial home.
- Why
- The court found that evidence established cruelty and that the relationship’s essential foundation, including mutual confidence, had substantially eroded.
Husband’s position
Wife’s position and court’s findings
Whether cruelty was established
Husband’s position
The husband’s lawyer argued that the wife’s allegations were not proved by evidence and did not amount to cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Wife’s position and court’s findings
The wife’s lawyer said she had identified and supported claims of physical and mental cruelty. The High Court found that the evidence, considered as a whole, showed a continuing course of discord.
Whether the marriage should continue
Husband’s position
The husband’s lawyer said his separate case seeking to resume the marriage showed his intention to continue the relationship.
Wife’s position and court’s findings
The wife’s lawyer said the husband’s conduct had caused mental agony and made continuation impossible. The court noted that both spouses expressed a desire to end the marriage when they appeared before it.
- Court
- Orissa High Court
- Judges
- Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Chittaranjan Dash
- Family court decree
- January 27, 2024
- High Court order
- October 1; the year is not specified in the article
- Ground for divorce
- Cruelty
- Marriage date
- October 20, 2021
- Separation
- The wife left the matrimonial home in June 2023 and went to Rayagada with her parents.