Archive · 7 Sep 2026
BJP grassroots unease grows over protests, Bhardwaj arrest
Some BJP supporters are unhappy with how the government handled recent protests.
The government agreed to withdraw certain criminal cases against exam-fraud protesters.
The Supreme Court then canceled those cases, except for protesters with past criminal records.
At the same time, police arrested Swatantra Bhardwaj after comments about a Dalit girl’s father.
Some activists believe his arrest was unfair because he is from an upper-caste community.
Other BJP figures acknowledge that his comments crossed a line.
The dispute is also connected to rules meant to address caste discrimination at universities.
BJP leaders worry that either keeping or withdrawing those rules could anger important groups of voters.
BJP leaders and right-wing activists criticized the Centre for withdrawing cases against exam-fraud protesters.
The Supreme Court quashed FIRs filed between July 20 and July 25 after the Centre promised to withdraw them.
Swatantra Bhardwaj was arrested after allegedly claiming he had attacked the father of a minor Dalit girl.
Some upper-caste activists called Bhardwaj’s arrest victimization while demanding stronger action against the Jantar Mantar protesters.
Opposition to the UGC equity rules has intensified as the BJP weighs upper-caste concerns against Dalit, tribal and OBC support.
- Who
- The Centre, BJP leaders, exam-fraud protesters, Swatantra Bhardwaj and upper-caste activists are central to the dispute.
- What
- The government’s withdrawal of protest cases and Bhardwaj’s arrest have triggered criticism within parts of the BJP and wider right-wing ecosystem.
- When
- The FIRs concerned protests from July 20 to July 25; Bhardwaj was arrested on Friday, followed by a demonstration on Saturday, with another rally announced for Monday.
- Where
- The events involve protests at Jantar Mantar and Parliament Street police station, with political concerns focused partly on Uttar Pradesh.
- Why
- Critics say the government capitulated to protest pressure, while the government’s actions also reflect legal and political concerns involving caste discrimination and election support.
Government balancing legal and electoral pressures
BJP grassroots and upper-caste critics
Withdrawal of protest cases
Government balancing legal and electoral pressures
The Centre assured the Supreme Court that the cases would be withdrawn, and the court quashed the specified FIRs while excluding protesters with criminal antecedents.
BJP grassroots and upper-caste critics
Some BJP leaders viewed the decision as an unacceptable capitulation to protest pressure that damaged the government’s image of strength.
Bhardwaj’s arrest
Government balancing legal and electoral pressures
BJP figures acknowledged that Bhardwaj’s public claim about attacking a minor Dalit girl’s father crossed a line and justified legal action.
BJP grassroots and upper-caste critics
Some Hindutva activists described the arrest as victimization of an upper-caste person and questioned why his case could not also be withdrawn.
UGC equity rules
Government balancing legal and electoral pressures
The rules are intended to address caste discrimination against Dalit, tribal and OBC students, but withdrawing them could upset those voter groups.
BJP grassroots and upper-caste critics
Upper-caste critics say the rules portray them as potential perpetrators, provide insufficient protection against false complaints and should be completely withdrawn.
- FIR withdrawal
- The Supreme Court quashed FIRs against protesters from July 20 to July 25 after a Centre assurance that the cases would be withdrawn.
- Exception
- Protesters with criminal antecedents were denied the relief.
- Bhardwaj arrest
- Swatantra Bhardwaj was arrested after a protest at Parliament Street police station.
- Contested statement
- Bhardwaj had publicly claimed that he had cracked the skull of the father of a minor Dalit girl.
- UGC equity rules
- The rules define caste discrimination as unfair treatment of Dalit, tribal and OBC students.
- Supreme Court stay
- The Supreme Court stayed implementation of the UGC rules in January.
- Centre’s position
- The Centre told the Supreme Court in August that it was reconsidering the rules.