Archive · 25 Aug 2026
Himachal High Court Raises Wife’s Maintenance After 15 Years
A woman asked the court for enough money to live after leaving her husband’s home.
She said she had been treated cruelly and had no independent income.
The case took more than 15 years to be resolved.
A lower court had ordered Rs 5,000 per month.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court said that amount was too small and could leave her in poverty.
It raised the payment in stages to reflect rising living costs.
The amount will reach Rs 9,000 per month through April 2026.
It will then increase by 5 per cent every two years.
The court said a husband who can work must help support his wife.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court increased a woman’s maintenance after her claim remained pending for more than 15 years.
It set payments at Rs 5,000 monthly from 2011 to 2016, Rs 7,000 from 2016 to 2021, and Rs 9,000 from 2021 to April 2026.
The court ordered a 5 per cent increase every two years from April 2026.
The woman said she faced cruelty, alleged dowry-related abuse, and had no independent income after leaving her matrimonial home.
The court said maintenance must be reasonable and realistic, considering inflation, the husband’s earning capacity, and the wife’s dignity.
- Who
- A woman and her husband; the case was decided by Justices Vivek Singh Thakur and Ranjan Sharma of the Himachal Pradesh High Court.
- What
- The court revised and increased the woman’s monthly maintenance award.
- When
- The claim had been pending for more than 15 years; revised payments apply from 2011 through April 2026, with increases beginning in April 2026. The article identifies the order as dated August 22.
- Where
- The Himachal Pradesh High Court in India.
- Why
- The court found that maintenance must account for inflation, the wife’s lack of sufficient income, the husband’s ability to earn, and her right to live with dignity.
Court and Wife’s Position
Husband’s Reported Position
Amount of maintenance
Court and Wife’s Position
The woman argued that Rs 5,000 per month was insufficient, and the High Court said maintenance must be reasonable, realistic, and adjusted for inflation.
Husband’s Reported Position
The husband’s side was not heard in the High Court proceedings; the article says he claimed he had no source of income.
Duty to provide support
Court and Wife’s Position
The court held that an able-bodied husband capable of earning cannot avoid his duty to maintain his wife.
Husband’s Reported Position
The husband reportedly argued that he had no income, but the court rejected that as a basis for avoiding maintenance.
Circumstances of the marriage
Court and Wife’s Position
The woman alleged cruelty, beatings, taunts, dowry-related treatment, and being treated like a slave, forcing her to leave the matrimonial home.
Husband’s Reported Position
The article does not provide a substantive response from the husband to these allegations because he was proceeded against ex parte.
- Maintenance from 2011–2016
- Rs 5,000 per month
- Maintenance from 2016–2021
- Rs 7,000 per month
- Maintenance from 2021–April 2026
- Rs 9,000 per month
- Future increase
- 5 per cent every two years from April 2026
- Husband’s reported income
- The woman said he earned Rs 50,000 per month as a college principal/lecturer, along with income from other sources.
- Lower-court award
- The family court had awarded Rs 5,000 per month from the filing of the maintenance plea.
- High Court proceedings
- The husband was proceeded against ex parte, meaning his side was not heard during the High Court proceedings.