Archive · 13 Aug 2026
Flock introduces police oversight rules after surveillance tool abuse
Flock is a company that puts cameras on roads to take pictures of cars and their license plates.
Police use these pictures to help solve crimes.
But some police officers used the cameras for bad reasons, like watching drivers or people they knew.
That caused some officers to lose their jobs or get arrested.
Because of this, Flock is making new safety rules.
Now police must type in a case number to explain why they are looking at the pictures.
If someone searches in a strange way, they will be locked out until a supervisor checks.
Flock will also keep pictures for only seven days instead of 30 days.
Police can keep pictures longer if they are part of a real case.
The CEO hopes these changes will help people trust the police again.
Flock introduced new safety controls on Thursday, including mandatory audits and stricter search safeguards for its license plate reader cameras.
The surveillance tools were reportedly abused by police officers for stalking drivers and former or romantic partners, leading to resignations and arrests.
All customers must enable the 'Audit Assistance' tool by the end of this year, which flags abnormal search behavior and locks users out pending administrator review.
Users must now enter a case number to justify each search, except for 'genuine emergencies,' which are automatically flagged for review.
Flock is cutting data retention from 30 days to seven days, while its 'Evidence Move' tool lets agencies preserve data longer when tied to a specific case number.
- Who
- Flock, a law enforcement technology company, its CEO Garrett Langley, and the police departments that contract with it.
- What
- Flock introduced new oversight rules — mandatory audits, case-number search requirements, and shorter data retention — after its surveillance tools were abused.
- When
- Announced on Thursday; the new requirements must be adopted by customers by the end of this year.
- Where
- Across Flock's nationwide network of automated license plate reader cameras mounted on public roads.
- Why
- Because officers reportedly used the system to stalk drivers and romantic partners, fueling privacy concerns and eroding public trust in law enforcement.
Privacy Advocates
Flock and Law Enforcement
Value of surveillance
Privacy Advocates
The camera network invades privacy and has enabled officers to stalk drivers and romantic partners.
Flock and Law Enforcement
The cameras are a crime-solving tool that police departments contract to use in investigations.
Data retention length
Privacy Advocates
Keeping data for 30 days is too long and raised concerns from the ACLU and others.
Flock and Law Enforcement
Retention supports investigations, and the cut to seven days still allows adjustments based on state or local policy.
Oversight approach
Privacy Advocates
Self-imposed industry rules may not be enough, as cities have cancelled contracts and critics have vandalised cameras.
Flock and Law Enforcement
Mandatory audits and behaviour-detection tools across all law enforcement technology will curb misuse and abuse.
- Company
- Flock
- CEO
- Garrett Langley
- Technology
- Automated license plate reader camera network
- Reported abuse
- Stalking drivers and former or romantic partners
- New audit tool
- Audit Assistance, flags abnormal search behavior
- Search requirement
- Case number required, except genuine emergencies flagged for review
- Data retention
- Reduced from 30 days to 7 days
- Deadline
- End of this year