Archive · 23 Jul 2026
Karnataka HC Rules on Inheritance Rights
The Karnataka High Court recently ruled that property inherited by a father from his own father's self-acquired assets does not automatically become ancestral property for his children.
In the case of Smt.
Usha N. Swamy v.
Sri M. Venkataswamy & Ors., the court dismissed a woman's claim for an equal share in properties that originally belonged to her grandfather.
The court held that since the assets were the grandfather's self-acquired properties, she could not claim a right in them by birth.
The court clarified that coparcenary rights by birth arise only in ancestral or coparcenary property, not in self-acquired property.
Daughters have the same coparcenary rights as sons, but these rights do not extend to self-acquired property.
Children do not have a birthright in a father’s self-acquired property during his lifetime and can only inherit such property if the father dies without leaving a will or if a share is specifically given to them under the will.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that property inherited by a father from his own father's self-acquired assets does not automatically become ancestral property for his children.
The court dismissed a woman's claim for an equal share in properties that originally belonged to her grandfather, holding that the assets were self-acquired.
Coparcenary rights by birth arise only in ancestral or coparcenary property, not in self-acquired property.
Daughters have the same coparcenary rights as sons, but these rights do not extend to self-acquired property.
Children do not have a birthright in a father’s self-acquired property during his lifetime and can only inherit such property if the father dies without leaving a will or if a share is specifically given to them under the will.
- Who
- Smt. Usha N. Swamy and the Karnataka High Court
- What
- A ruling on the nature of property inherited by a father from his own father's self-acquired assets and the rights of grandchildren to claim a share in such property.
- When
- The judgment was delivered on 16 June.
- Where
- Karnataka High Court, India
- Why
- To clarify the legal character of property inherited by a father from his own father's self-acquired assets and the rights of grandchildren to claim a share in such property.
Claimant's Perspective
Court's Perspective
Nature of Property
Claimant's Perspective
The properties were ancestral and should be divided equally among all coparceners.
Court's Perspective
The properties were self-acquired by the grandfather and retained that character even after being inherited by the father.
Coparcenary Rights
Claimant's Perspective
Daughters have the same coparcenary rights as sons and should be entitled to an equal share.
Court's Perspective
Coparcenary rights by birth arise only in ancestral or coparcenary property, not in self-acquired property.
- Case Name
- Smt. Usha N. Swamy v. Sri M. Venkataswamy & Ors.
- Court
- Karnataka High Court
- Judges
- Justices DK Singh and TM Nadaf
- Key Legal Principle
- Property inherited by a father from his own father's self-acquired assets does not automatically become ancestral property in the hands of grandchildren.
- Legal Amendment
- Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005
- Ancestral Property Definition
- Property inherited by birth as part of an undivided Hindu coparcenary, typically tracing its origin to a common ancestor and remaining undivided across generations.
- Self-Acquired Property Definition
- Property acquired by an individual through purchase, gift, will, or personal effort, over which they have absolute ownership.