Archive · 7 Oct 2026
Questions Mount Over Gyanesh Kumar’s Election Commission Leadership
India’s Election Commission helps manage voter lists and elections.
A report said two election commissioners raised objections about some decisions involving voter records.
The Commission acknowledged the notes but said the decisions were eventually unanimous.
One concern involved changes to an online form used by people registering to vote.
Another involved 97 voters in Goa whose restoration was reportedly delayed because the software did not allow an officer’s decision to be entered.
The Supreme Court is considering petitions about the chief election commissioner’s actions and the voter-list revision process.
Those claims have not been proved by the Court.
The article argues that the Commission should explain its decisions clearly so voters can trust the election system.
A media report said Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded 14 objections over electoral-roll decisions and processes in 10 months.
The Election Commission acknowledged the notes but said the decisions were ultimately unanimous.
The article says the commissioners objected to SIR-related changes to Form 6 on the ECINet portal, calling them illegal and unauthorised.
It describes a case in Goa in which 97 voters reportedly could not immediately be restored because central software would not record an Electoral Registration Officer’s decision.
The Supreme Court is examining petitions challenging aspects of Kumar’s functioning and the legal basis of the Special Intensive Revision; the article stresses that the claims are allegations, not findings.
- Who
- Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar; Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi; and the Election Commission of India.
- What
- Reported internal objections, disputed Form 6 changes and concerns about electoral-roll software have prompted calls for independent scrutiny; petitions concerning Kumar and the SIR process are before the Supreme Court.
- When
- The reported objections occurred over 10 months; the article gives no dates for the other events.
- Where
- India, including a reported case involving 97 voters in Goa.
- Why
- The issues raise questions about electoral-roll decisions, statutory authority, software controls and public confidence in the Election Commission.
Calls for scrutiny
Commission’s stated position
Internal objections and decision-making
Calls for scrutiny
The article argues that the frequency and subject matter of the reported objections warrant transparent, independent scrutiny of how electoral decisions were made.
Commission’s stated position
The Election Commission acknowledged the notes but maintained that the decisions were ultimately unanimous.
Changes to Form 6
Calls for scrutiny
The two commissioners reportedly considered SIR-related changes to the statutory form illegal and unauthorised, arguing that prescribed legal procedures should be followed.
Commission’s stated position
The article does not provide a detailed response from the Commission to this specific objection.
Leadership and SIR challenges
Calls for scrutiny
The article calls for a time-bound examination of the controversies and says questions about institutional confidence cannot be dismissed as partisan politics.
Commission’s stated position
The article notes that the petitions raise allegations, not judicial findings, and that Gyanesh Kumar has not been judicially found guilty of wrongdoing.
- Reported objections
- 14 objections recorded by Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi over 10 months, according to a media report.
- Election Commission response
- The Commission acknowledged the notes and said decisions were ultimately unanimous.
- Form 6 dispute
- The two commissioners reportedly objected to SIR-related changes on the ECINet portal, describing them as illegal and unauthorised.
- Goa voters
- The article says 97 voters found eligible by an Electoral Registration Officer could not immediately be restored because central software would not record the decision.
- Court proceedings
- The Supreme Court is examining petitions challenging aspects of Gyanesh Kumar’s functioning and the nationwide SIR exercise.
- Status of allegations
- The article says the allegations are before the Court and are not judicial findings of wrongdoing.