Archive · 16 Sep 2026
Hackers Expose Flock Camera Tracking and Security Weaknesses
Hackers found a way into one Flock camera, which is used to watch vehicles.
They copied some of the information stored inside it.
This included thousands of videos and records of vehicles passing by.
The camera uses many small programs to detect motion, study pictures and send information away.
It can take many pictures of one vehicle, sometimes more than a million over time.
Some programs also recognized people in a few video clips, mostly people riding motorcycles.
The camera did not appear to use facial recognition beyond what the normal Android system can do.
The discovery also showed that the camera often ran out of storage space.
Hackers bypassed a Flock camera’s security and copied stored data, including thousands of videos and vehicle detections.
They recovered an encryption key from the device, although some sensitive storage tied to automatic license-plate reading remained inaccessible.
404 Media found that the camera runs about 20 apps for motion detection, image processing, object classification, data uploads and updates.
The camera produced dozens of images of individual vehicles and could generate more than a million images of a passing vehicle.
Logs recorded more than 27,000 storage errors, while critics warned that sabotaging cameras could strengthen government arguments for surveillance.
- Who
- Hackers, 404 Media, Flock, and critics including former Pawtucket police officer Noel Picardo.
- What
- Hackers bypassed a Flock camera’s security and revealed details about its surveillance software, data processing and storage problems.
- When
- Recently; the article does not provide a specific date.
- Where
- On Flock cameras used across United States road networks; the specific camera’s location is not identified.
- Why
- The hackers shared their findings to show how the camera tracks vehicles, processes images and stores data.
Privacy and Security Critics
Surveillance Supporters and Defenders
Use of Flock cameras
Privacy and Security Critics
Critics argue that the cameras enable broad tracking of vehicles and people, and point to past data breaches and unofficial use as reasons for concern.
Surveillance Supporters and Defenders
President Donald Trump supports the surveillance system, while Flock’s stated position is that its cameras do not perform facial recognition beyond the capabilities of the default Android operating system.
Hacking and sabotage
Privacy and Security Critics
The breach exposed security weaknesses and showed that hackers could access substantial camera data and recover an encryption key.
Surveillance Supporters and Defenders
Noel Picardo said activists have a valid point but argued that sabotaging the devices could strengthen the government’s case for using the cameras.
System reliability
Privacy and Security Critics
Storage errors and repeated “no space left on device” messages raise concerns about the system’s reliability and data handling.
Surveillance Supporters and Defenders
The article does not report a defense of the storage problems, but the camera continued to run software for detecting, processing and transmitting vehicle data.
- Data accessed
- Hackers copied camera storage and recovered an encryption key, obtaining thousands of videos and vehicle detections.
- Data still inaccessible
- Some sensitive areas and storage used by the automatic license-plate reader could not be accessed.
- Built-in software
- The camera runs about 20 apps handling motion detection, image processing, object classification, uploads and remote updates.
- Vehicle imaging
- The camera can produce dozens of images of one passing vehicle and more than a million images of a vehicle passing by.
- People detected
- Recovered models recognized people in 11 clips, mostly people riding motorcycles.
- Storage errors
- Camera logs recorded more than 27,000 messages stating “no space left on device.”
- Other log messages
- The system repeatedly logged “who’s a good boy?” and recorded “Adios Amigos” after rebooting.