Archive · 24 Jul 2025
Supreme Court Slams High Court on Darshan Bail Case
The Supreme Court is unhappy with how a lower court, the High Court, handled the case of actor Darshan, who is accused of a serious crime.
The Supreme Court believes the High Court made a mistake by letting Darshan out on bail.
The Supreme Court is saying the High Court's decision was not right and that it looked like the High Court was taking the actor's side.
The Supreme Court pointed out how the High Court explained its decision, which didn't seem appropriate for a murder case.
The Supreme Court is now involved to make sure the right thing is done.
Supreme Court criticized Karnataka High Court's bail decision for actor Darshan.
The Supreme Court called the High Court's actions a 'perverse exercise of judicial power'.
This is the second time in a week the Supreme Court has rebuked the High Court.
The Supreme Court questioned the High Court's reasoning in the bail order.
The case involves actor Darshan in the kidnap, torture, and murder of Renukaswamy.
- Who
- The Supreme Court and Karnataka High Court, Actor Darshan
- What
- The Supreme Court criticized the Karnataka High Court's decision to grant bail to actor Darshan.
- When
- Thursday afternoon
- Where
- Supreme Court
- Why
- The Supreme Court considered the High Court's decision a 'perverse exercise of judicial power'.
Supreme Court's Concerns
High Court's Actions
Judicial Discretion
Supreme Court's Concerns
Supreme Court found the High Court's decision to grant bail to Darshan as a "perverse exercise of judicial power".
High Court's Actions
The original article does not explicitly state the High Court's reasoning.
- Accused
- Actor Darshan
- Crime
- Kidnap, torture, and murder of Renukaswamy
- Court in question
- Karnataka High Court
- Supreme Court's Stance
- Criticized High Court's decision
- Date of Criticism
- Thursday