Archive · 10 Sep 2026
Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Extortion Case Linked to Sting
A reporter was asked to conduct a sting operation involving then chief minister Trivendra Singh Rawat.
The reporter said he was threatened when he did not do it.
A man had helped the reporter arrange a meeting with Rawat.
The man was named in a police case about extortion and conspiracy.
The Uttarakhand High Court said the case did not explain what illegal act the man had committed.
It found no evidence that he threatened anyone or asked for money.
Investigators also found no incriminating material against him.
The court therefore stopped the criminal case against him.
Two other people had been charged in the wider investigation.
The Uttarakhand High Court quashed a 2018 extortion and criminal conspiracy case against a man linked to a proposed sting operation.
The petitioner had helped a Samachar Plus reporter secure an appointment with then Uttarakhand chief minister Trivendra Singh Rawat.
The reporter alleged that the channel’s CEO and the petitioner threatened his career and life if he did not conduct the sting.
Justice Alok Mahra found no specific allegation that the petitioner threatened the reporter, demanded money, or joined a criminal conspiracy.
The court noted that investigators found no incriminating material against the petitioner, while a chargesheet was filed against two other accused in 2019.
- Who
- The petitioner, a Samachar Plus reporter, the channel’s CEO, and then chief minister Trivendra Singh Rawat were involved in the case; Justice Alok Mahra issued the ruling.
- What
- The Uttarakhand High Court quashed the extortion and criminal conspiracy case against the petitioner.
- When
- The FIR was registered in 2018; a chargesheet against two other accused was filed on March 25, 2019; the court issued its order on September 8.
- Where
- The FIR was registered at Rajpur Police Station in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, and the matter was decided by the Uttarakhand High Court.
- Why
- The court found that the FIR assigned the petitioner no specific criminal role and that the investigation found no incriminating material against him.
Court and Petitioner’s Position
Reporter’s Allegations
Petitioner’s role
Court and Petitioner’s Position
The petitioner argued, and the court agreed, that merely helping arrange an appointment did not establish extortion, threats, or criminal conspiracy.
Reporter’s Allegations
The reporter identified the petitioner as someone the channel’s CEO said could help arrange the meeting for the proposed sting operation.
Threats and extortion
Court and Petitioner’s Position
The court found no direct allegation or evidence that the petitioner threatened or intimidated the reporter, demanded money, or placed him in fear of injury.
Reporter’s Allegations
The reporter alleged that the CEO and the petitioner threatened to ruin his career and kill him if he did not carry out the sting.
Continuation of proceedings
Court and Petitioner’s Position
The court said continuing the case would be unjustified because no specific overt act or prima facie material connected the petitioner to the alleged offences.
Reporter’s Allegations
The criminal case arose from the reporter’s 2018 complaint concerning alleged threats over the failed sting operation.
- Case registration
- 2018, at Rajpur Police Station in Dehradun
- Alleged offences
- Extortion under Sections 386 and 388 of the Indian Penal Code, along with criminal conspiracy
- Petitioner’s alleged role
- Helping a reporter secure an appointment with then chief minister Trivendra Singh Rawat
- Court
- Uttarakhand High Court
- Judge
- Justice Alok Mahra
- Other accused
- A chargesheet was filed against the news channel’s CEO and another person on March 25, 2019
- Investigation finding
- No incriminating material was found against the petitioner