Archive · 18 Dec 2025
NGT Stays Punjab Farmhouses Policy Implementation
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has temporarily stopped Punjab's new policy that allows building farmhouses on certain lands.
Some people, including a lawyer named Kapil Arora, argued in court that this policy goes against the rules set by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court had said that this land should only be used for farming, not for building houses.
The Punjab government says they followed the rules and that the land is not in an environmentally sensitive area.
The NGT has decided to wait until February 4 before making a final decision.
The government has also said they won't do anything more with the policy until then.
The policy was supposed to allow small houses on big pieces of land, with rules to protect the environment.
NGT grants interim stay on Punjab’s farmhouses policy implementation until February 4.
Petitioners allege the policy violates Supreme Court directions on land use and environmental norms.
Punjab government claims the policy adheres to Supreme Court norms and is not in an eco-sensitive zone.
Policy allows two-storeyed houses on 4,000 square yards plots with environmental safeguards.
Government will charge construction fees ranging from Rs 300 to Rs 1200 per square yard.
- Who
- National Green Tribunal (NGT), Punjab Government, Petitioners (Kapil Arora, Gagnish Khurana, Mohit Jain)
- What
- Interim stay on Punjab’s farmhouses policy implementation
- When
- Next hearing on February 4
- Where
- Punjab, India (Shivalik hills, between Mohali and Pathankot)
- Why
- Policy allegedly violates Supreme Court directions regarding land use and environmental norms
- Petitioners
- Kapil Arora, Gagnish Khurana, Mohit Jain
- Interim Stay Date
- February 4
- Land Area
- 60,000 acres in kandi area
- Construction Fee
- Rs 300 to Rs 1200 per square yard
- Policy Objective
- Regularisation of existing structures and permitting new low-impact residential units
- Government's Stance
- Policy adheres to Supreme Court norms and directions
- Petitioner's Allegation
- Policy violates Supreme Court directions and favours VIPs and land sharks