21 hrs ago

Delhi High Court Upholds Rs 75,000 Family Maintenance

Delhi High Court Upholds Rs 75,000 Family Maintenance
‘Not excessive’: Delhi High Court backs Rs 75,000 monthly maintenance for wife, son · indianexpress.com

A court in Delhi decided that a husband must temporarily pay Rs 75,000 each month to his wife and young son.

The money is split equally between them.

The husband said the amount was too high because he has other expenses and a housing loan.

He also said his wife could earn money through teaching and private tuition.

The court said there was no proof that she was earning from private tuition.

It also noted that the husband had not shown documents proving his housing-loan liability.

The judges said maintenance helps families meet basic needs and live with dignity.

The court made clear that this is only an interim decision, and the final amount can change after more evidence is presented.

Key facts

Monthly maintenance
Rs 75,000 for the wife and minor son
Allocation
Rs 37,500 each for the wife and son
Husband’s reported annual income
Approximately Rs 32-35 lakh
Family court income assessment
The husband’s monthly income was estimated at Rs 2 lakh
Marriage
The couple married in April 2019
Child’s birth
Their son was born in September 2023
Separation
The couple began living separately on June 10, 2025
Legal basis cited
Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, concerning monthly maintenance

Quotes

Delhi High Court

The court issuing the interim maintenance ruling through Justice Prateek Jalan.

“It is well settled that the object of Section 125 (monthly maintenance) CrPC is to prevent destitution of the wife and children. The provision is intended to secure the basic sustenance and dignity of the wife and children and to ensure that a husband does not evade his moral and familial obligation to maintain them despite having sufficient means to do so.”
indianexpress.com
“Considering that the maintenance is awarded for the wife, as well as the minor child, the amount of Rs 75,000 per month cannot, in the circumstances, be said to be excessive or disproportionate.”
indianexpress.com

Sources

Related news