Archive · 26 Sep 2026
Election Commission Under Scrutiny Over Reported Internal Objections
The Election Commission of India is facing questions about how some decisions were made.
Reports say two election commissioners wrote objections about several issues.
These issues included a review of voter lists and a work allocation order dated July 28.
The reports also mentioned the Special Intensive Revision.
Attention has focused on Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
Critics are asking whether the Commission’s internal process is transparent enough.
The Commission says disagreements can happen during discussions.
It also says the final decisions were unanimous.
The debate is about accountability and trust in the election process.
Reports say Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded written objections to several decisions.
The reported objections concern the Special Intensive Revision, voter rolls and a July 28 work allocation order.
The episode examines Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s role in the Commission’s decision-making process.
Questions have been raised about transparency and accountability within the Election Commission of India.
The ECI says differing views are part of deliberations and maintains that its decisions were unanimous.
- Who
- Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi are central to the report.
- What
- Reports describe written objections to decisions involving voter rolls, the Special Intensive Revision and a July 28 work allocation order.
- When
- The objections reportedly occurred over the past 10 months; one disputed order was dated July 28.
- Where
- The issue concerns the Election Commission of India.
- Why
- Questions have been raised about internal decision-making, transparency and accountability, while the ECI says differing views are normal and its decisions were unanimous.
Critics and Transparency Concerns
Election Commission’s Response
Internal disagreements
Critics and Transparency Concerns
The reported written objections suggest that commissioners differed over several decisions and raise questions about how the Commission reached them.
Election Commission’s Response
The ECI says differing views are a normal part of deliberations and maintains that the decisions ultimately taken by the Commission were unanimous.
Transparency and accountability
Critics and Transparency Concerns
Questions remain about whether the Commission’s decision-making process, including issues involving voter rolls and work allocation, has been sufficiently transparent.
Election Commission’s Response
The ECI’s stated position is that its deliberative process can include differing views while still producing unanimous final decisions.
- Institution
- Election Commission of India
- Chief Election Commissioner
- Gyanesh Kumar
- Commissioners named
- Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi
- Reported objections
- Written objections to several decisions
- Issues cited
- Special Intensive Revision, voter rolls and a July 28 work allocation order
- ECI position
- Differing views are part of deliberations, and Commission decisions were unanimous