1 week ago
Questions Remain Before RCMP Shelves Air India 182 Investigation
The article says investigators found an important lead about a possible 1984 plan to bomb an Air India plane.
Two people separately described almost the same plan.
One of them passed a lie-detector test.
Investigators also identified a person called “W” as a possible source of phone calls to Reyat.
Another protected person, called “Z,” was questioned.
A later review said investigators should ask more questions of W, Z and Person 2.
The article asks whether surviving witnesses were interviewed again and offered protection.
It also asks who checked in two bags that were traveling without passengers.
A separate 1984 lead concerned a plot to bomb an Air India aircraft.
Person 1 and Person 2 independently reported substantially the same plot, and Person 1 passed a polygraph.
The likely source of calls to Reyat was identified as “W,” an International Sikh Youth Federation member linked to Parmar, Gill and Reyat.
Another protected person, “Z,” was examined, while a later review recommended further inquiries involving W, Z and Person 2.
Questions remain about whether survivors were re-interviewed, offered protection and whether investigators determined who checked in two unaccompanied bags.
- Who
- The RCMP, Person 1, Person 2, protected individuals “W” and “Z,” and people identified as Parmar, Gill and Reyat.
- What
- The article raises unresolved questions about investigative leads connected to an Air India bombing plot and two unaccompanied bags.
- Where
- The articles do not specify where the events or bag check-in occurred.
- When
- The separate bombing plot was reported as occurring in 1984; a later review recommended additional inquiries.
- Why
- To determine whether investigative avenues were truly exhausted and whether witnesses and surviving leads received appropriate follow-up and protection.
Key facts
- Separate lead
- A 1984 plot to bomb an Air India aircraft was reported.
- Independent reports
- Person 1 and Person 2 independently reported substantially the same plot.
- Polygraph
- Person 1 passed a polygraph.
- Potential source
- “W” was identified as the likely source of calls to Reyat.
- Protected witness
- “Z” was examined; the article distinguishes this person from Mr. Z.
- Review recommendation
- A later review recommended seeking more information from W, Z and Person 2.
- Unanswered question
- The article asks who checked in the two unaccompanied bags.
Sources
Related news
Families Resist Proposed Closure of Air India Kanishka Investigation
Air India Bombing Inquiry Highlights Decades-Old Canadian Investigative Lapses
Bomb Threat Grounds IndiGo Flight Bound for Gorakhpur
Mumbra Woman Faces ATS Probe Over Passport and Family Links
Man Arrested Over Alleged Indian, Pakistani Passport Possession in Thane
FAS Alleges Lack of Transparency in Air India Crash Probe
