Archive · 27 Dec 2025
Lawyer Criticizes Evidence Gaps in Zubeen Garg Case
A senior lawyer named A R Bhuyan is concerned about the investigation into Zubeen Garg's death.
He says the chargesheet, which is like a formal list of charges, doesn't have enough evidence.
The lawyer points out that important evidence from Singapore, where the incident happened, wasn't collected properly.
He also says that the chargesheet only mentions a small water bottle as evidence, which isn't enough to prove what really happened.
The lawyer believes that more evidence, like videos and forensic proof, is needed to make sure justice is served.
He also mentions that the legal process between India and Singapore could help get more evidence, but it hasn't been used yet.
The lawyer warns that if the evidence isn't strong enough, the people accused might not be found guilty.
Senior lawyer A R Bhuyan criticizes the investigation and chargesheet in Zubeen Garg's case.
Bhuyan highlights lapses in evidence collection, particularly from Singapore.
The chargesheet is deemed limited, mentioning only a 500 ml water bottle as evidence.
Bhuyan emphasizes the need for visual and forensic evidence, including video footage.
The Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) between India and Singapore could help obtain more evidence.
- Who
- Senior lawyer A R Bhuyan and petitioners seeking justice for Zubeen Garg
- What
- Criticism of lapses in the investigation and chargesheet in Zubeen Garg's case
- When
- December 27
- Where
- Guwahati, India, with the incident occurring in Singapore
- Why
- To ensure justice is delivered and to highlight the need for stronger evidence
- Lawyer's Name
- A R Bhuyan
- Case Involving
- Zubeen Garg
- Location of Incident
- Singapore
- Key Evidence Mentioned
- 500 ml water bottle
- Legal Framework Referenced
- Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT)
- Lawyer's Concern
- Inadequate evidence collection and presentation
- Required Evidence
- Visual and forensic evidence, including video footage