Archive · 25 Aug 2026
Mumbai CBI Court Rejects Ashalatha Shetty’s Discharge Plea
Ashalatha Shetty asked a court to remove her from a case about allegedly unexplained property and money.
The court refused to do that.
The case also involves her husband, Gokulnath Shetty.
Investigators say the couple bought several flats that cost more than their known income.
Ashalatha’s lawyer said she was not required to report the properties and that there was not enough evidence against her.
The CBI said both spouses were public servants and used money from their own bank accounts.
The court said there was enough evidence to continue the case and consider charges.
The alleged assets were valued at about Rs 2.63 crore initially and Rs 4.28 crore after further investigation.
The special CBI court rejected Ashalatha Shetty’s plea seeking discharge from the case.
The case concerns alleged disproportionate assets acquired by Ashalatha and her husband, Gokulnath Shetty.
Her lawyer argued that she was not required to declare properties and lacked sufficient links to the alleged assets.
The CBI said both accused were public servants who purchased properties jointly using funds from their accounts.
The court cited assets of approximately Rs 2.63 crore, later rising to Rs 4.28 crore during further investigation.
- Who
- Ashalatha Shetty and her husband, former Punjab National Bank deputy manager Gokulnath Shetty; the Central Bureau of Investigation is prosecuting the case.
- What
- A special CBI court rejected Ashalatha Shetty’s plea for discharge in a disproportionate-assets case.
- When
- The ruling was reported on August 25, 2026; the alleged check period ran from April 1, 2011, to May 31, 2017.
- Where
- The case is before the Special CBI Court in Mumbai and concerns flats in Malad, Panvel and Thane.
- Why
- The court found sufficient grounds to proceed, citing alleged property holdings disproportionate to the accused persons’ known income.
Ashalatha Shetty’s defense
CBI prosecution and court findings
Sufficiency of evidence
Ashalatha Shetty’s defense
Ashalatha’s lawyer argued that there was insufficient evidence to frame charges and that her husband’s use of her name when purchasing flats did not prove she had amassed disproportionate assets.
CBI prosecution and court findings
The CBI argued that the evidence established grounds to proceed, and the court found ample evidence and sufficient grounds to frame charges.
Property declarations
Ashalatha Shetty’s defense
The defense said Ashalatha, described as a clerk, was not required to submit or declare her properties to her department or bank.
CBI prosecution and court findings
The CBI and court said she was a public servant who had not informed her bank or department about the flat bookings and payments.
Income and property value
Ashalatha Shetty’s defense
The defense disputed that Ashalatha had independently acquired disproportionate assets.
CBI prosecution and court findings
The CBI cited her approximate income of Rs 48 lakh against property purchases exceeding Rs 88 lakh, while the court relied on broader figures for the couple’s assets and alleged disproportion.
- Court
- Special CBI Court, Mumbai
- Accused
- Ashalatha Shetty and Gokulnath Shetty
- Initial assets cited
- Approximately Rs 2.63 crore, described as 238.44% disproportionate to known income
- Further-investigation figure
- Approximately Rs 4.28 crore, described as 590.83% disproportionate to the accused persons’ own income
- Properties
- Three flats in Malad, Panvel and Thane
- Check period
- April 1, 2011, to May 31, 2017
- Reported payments
- Rs 15.78 lakh for Panvel, Rs 11 lakh for Thane and Rs 3.01 crore for Malad