5 days ago
Bachupally Plot Dispute Reaches Civic Authorities Over Construction
A disagreement has arisen over who owns a plot of land in Bachupally.
Bodempudi Padmaja says she bought the 200-square-yard plot in 1992.
Her representative says other people entered the property and started building pillars in June 2026.
The representative complained to the police, but the matter was marked as civil in nature.
Later sale documents were found for the same plot, and Padmaja disputes them.
She has filed a case in civil court to recover the land and cancel those documents.
Her representative has asked civic officials not to approve construction or provide services to the people claiming the land.
The officials are being asked to wait until the court decides who is legally entitled to the property.
A GPA holder for NRI Bodempudi Padmaja has asked civic authorities to halt construction and approvals for a disputed 200-square-yard Bachupally plot.
Padmaja claims ownership of Plot No. 949, Block No. 57, purchased through registered sale deed No. 10848 of 1992.
The representation alleges that unauthorized construction began in June 2026 and names K.V. Krishna Reddy and others.
Two later sale deeds, from 1998 and 2024, appear in the property’s Encumbrance Certificate and are disputed by Padmaja.
A civil suit seeks possession and declarations invalidating the disputed deeds, while authorities were asked to withhold civic permissions until its resolution.
- Who
- Bodempudi Padmaja, through her General Power of Attorney holder, is disputing claims involving K.V. Krishna Reddy and others.
- What
- The GPA holder is seeking a halt to construction and civic permissions for a disputed 200-square-yard plot, pending a civil suit.
- Where
- Plot No. 949, Block No. 57, in Bachupally Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district, Hyderabad.
- When
- The plot was reportedly purchased on October 31, 1992; alleged construction began in June 2026, and representations and complaints were made on August 6 and July 4, 2026, respectively.
- Why
- Padmaja disputes the validity of later sale deeds recorded for the property and seeks possession and a court declaration that those deeds are not binding.
Key facts
- Property
- Plot No. 949, Block No. 57, measuring 200 square yards
- Original purchase
- Registered sale deed No. 10848 of 1992, dated October 31, 1992
- Disputed documents
- Sale deed No. 445 of 1998 and sale deed No. 26928 of 2024
- Alleged construction
- Pillars were allegedly erected without authorization in June 2026
- Police complaint
- A complaint was lodged at Bachupally Police Station and recorded as civil in nature
- Civil case
- The suit seeks recovery of possession, cancellation of the disputed deeds and a mandatory injunction
- Requested action
- Authorities were asked to withhold building, development, utility, mutation, registration and occupancy approvals until the suit is decided
Sources
Related news
HYDRAA fences 400-sq-yd park in Chandanagar after encroachment complaints
Gujarat HC Withdraws Yusuf Pathan Appeal Over Vadodara Land
HYDRAA Assures Vanasthalipuram Residents of Public Land Protection
Telangana High Court Summons Collector, Officials Over Malkajgiri Land Dispute
Vadodara Plot Dispute Puts Municipal Land Auctions Under Scrutiny
Police identify real 'Radha' in Bengaluru's Rs 100-crore plot dispute
HMDA to Auction 70 Residential Plots in Mokila, Bachupally
Telangana Postal Circle Introduces Rakhi Envelopes and Gangajal
Dr Reddy’s Secures FDA Approval for Rituximab Biosimilar
Four Killed in Sangareddy Road Accident
