Archive · 24 Aug 2026
Delhi High Court Stays Defamation Case Against Sudarshan TV
A madrasa operator complained that a television channel made damaging claims about his organisation.
He said the channel accused it of anti-national activities, illegal funding and brainwashing children.
He also said people came to his home, called him a Bangladeshi and shared his phone number.
According to him, this led to death threats.
He filed a criminal defamation case against several people, including Sudarshan TV and Suresh Chavhanke.
A lower court said the broadcasts and social media posts appeared defamatory at an early stage.
The Delhi High Court has now paused the case for the time being.
The court will consider the matter again at a later hearing.
The Delhi High Court stayed criminal defamation proceedings against Sudarshan TV and Suresh Chavhanke.
Mohammed Tufail Khan alleged broadcasts falsely accused his madrasa of anti-national activities, illicit funding and brainwashing children.
Khan said residents and media personnel entered his home, called him a Bangladeshi and exposed his phone number, resulting in death threats.
A city court earlier found the broadcasts and social media posts prima facie defamatory and issued bailable warrants after non-appearance.
The High Court stay will remain in effect until the next date of hearing.
- Who
- Mohammed Tufail Khan filed the case against Sudarshan TV, Suresh Chavhanke, Maya Chavhanke and Mufti Wajahat Qasmi.
- What
- The Delhi High Court stayed criminal defamation proceedings linked to broadcasts alleging that Khan’s madrasa was involved in anti-national activities.
- When
- The stay was ordered on August 21; other proceedings and court actions occurred on October 19, April 6 and May 30, with years not specified in the article.
- Where
- The proceedings are before courts in Delhi, involving broadcasts by Sudarshan TV.
- Why
- The stay followed Khan’s allegations that the broadcasts and related claims were defamatory; the defense argued that Chavhanke was only an anchor and lacked criminal intent.
Petitioner's allegations
Defense position
Content of broadcasts
Petitioner's allegations
Mohammed Tufail Khan alleged that Sudarshan TV and others falsely accused his organisation of anti-national activities, illicit funding and brainwashing children.
Defense position
The article does not report a detailed response from Sudarshan TV, but counsel submitted that Suresh Chavhanke was only an anchor of a television show.
Criminal intention
Petitioner's allegations
Khan pursued criminal defamation proceedings over the alleged broadcasts and related accusations.
Defense position
Counsel argued that Chavhanke had no criminal intention.
Initial court findings
Petitioner's allegations
A city court found the allegations in the broadcasts and social media posts to be prima facie defamatory.
Defense position
The High Court has paused the trial-court proceedings while the matter continues.
- Petitioner
- Mohammed Tufail Khan, who runs Jamia Arabia Nizami Welfare Educational Society.
- Organisation described
- The society is described as an NGO and madrasa providing shelter, food and clothing to about 70 orphans.
- Allegations
- Khan alleged accusations of anti-national activities, illicit funding and brainwashing children.
- High Court action
- The Delhi High Court stayed the trial-court proceedings until the next hearing.
- Lower-court assessment
- A city court found the broadcasts and social media posts prima facie defamatory.
- Bailable warrants
- Warrants were issued on April 6 after non-appearance and cancelled on May 30 after appearances were recorded.