Archive · 21 Sep 2026
Telangana Education Debate Centers on Parents, Curriculum and Infrastructure
People are discussing who should decide what children learn in Telangana schools.
Abhishek believes experts should have more influence because they may understand future jobs and national needs.
He still thinks parents should be involved, but with less weight.
Chava Ravi said many schools also need better buildings, more teachers, and stronger supervision.
Ashish Neridi said parents usually are not included when curricula are prepared.
Ramanjit Singh said parents should be consulted more often.
He also said children should be able to choose subjects that fit their interests and abilities.
The discussion is about balancing expert guidance, parent participation, and children’s needs.
Experts and educators disagree over how much influence parents should have in curriculum decisions.
Abhishek argued that educational experts, industrialists, and IIT and IIM representatives should lead syllabus design, while parents retain a role.
Teachers’ federation president Chava Ravi highlighted 26,000 schools, a ₹1,100 crore development allocation, poor infrastructure, staff shortages, and weak supervision.
Ashish Neridi said parents generally have no role in curriculum preparation, unlike in some countries such as the USA.
Ramanjit Singh said parents are often bystanders and urged subject choices and teaching methods to reflect children’s abilities and interests.
- Who
- Abhishek, Chava Ravi of the Telangana State United Teachers’ Federation, Ashish Neridi of Indic International School, and Ramanjit Singh expressed views.
- What
- The participants debated parental involvement in education, curriculum design, emerging subjects, and school infrastructure.
- When
- The articles do not specify when the discussion took place.
- Where
- Telangana, including Hyderabad.
- Why
- The debate concerns how to design suitable curricula, involve parents, address children’s different abilities, and improve struggling schools.
Expert-Led Curriculum
Greater Parent and Student Participation
Who should shape the syllabus?
Expert-Led Curriculum
Abhishek said educational experts, industrialists, and people from IITs and IIMs should lead decisions because they may understand future needs; parents should have a smaller role.
Greater Parent and Student Participation
Ashish Neridi and Ramanjit Singh said parents are generally excluded and should have a meaningful role in curriculum and education decisions.
Emerging subjects and cognitive load
Expert-Led Curriculum
Abhishek argued that schools may introduce concepts such as artificial intelligence without ensuring that children of different ages can understand them properly.
Greater Parent and Student Participation
Ramanjit Singh said topics such as coding, AI, and design thinking can increase cognitive load and that children should have choices based on their abilities and interests.
How should schools respond to education problems?
Expert-Led Curriculum
The expert-led perspective emphasizes preparing children for future national and industrial needs through appropriate curriculum design.
Greater Parent and Student Participation
Chava Ravi emphasized immediate school-system problems, including dilapidated buildings, teacher shortages, and weak supervision, while the other speakers called for stronger parent participation.
- Schools in Telangana
- The state has 26,000 schools.
- Development allocation
- The state government announced ₹1,100 crore for school development.
- Infrastructure concerns
- Several schools were described as being in dilapidated condition.
- Staffing concerns
- A shortage of teaching staff was identified as a problem.
- Supervision
- The supervisory mechanism was described as virtually non-existent.
- Curriculum concerns
- Participants discussed coding, artificial intelligence, design thinking, inference, and reasoning.
- Parent participation
- The speakers said parents are rarely consulted about curricula and teaching methods.