Archive · 29 Sep 2026
Candidate Rejected After Questioning Company’s Faulty Assessment Link
A job applicant received an email with a link for an assessment.
The link reportedly led to the company’s general careers page instead of the assessment.
The applicant asked HR for the correct link.
HR said the careers page had been provided intentionally.
The company expected applicants to find the assessment instructions themselves.
HR then rejected the applicant, saying the exchange showed insufficient attention to detail.
People online disagreed about whether the applicant or HR handled the situation poorly.
The claims came from a user-generated post and were not independently verified by News18.
A candidate said the assessment link in a recruitment email redirected to the company’s general careers page.
The candidate asked HR to provide the correct link before the stated deadline.
HR said applicants were expected to follow instructions and navigate the careers page independently.
The recruiter rejected the candidate, citing attention to detail, initiative, and problem-solving expectations.
Online reactions were divided, but the article said the original claims were not independently verified.
- Who
- A job candidate, the company’s HR team, and a recruiter were involved; the incident was discussed by Reddit users.
- What
- The candidate was rejected after asking HR to clarify an assessment link that reportedly redirected to the company’s careers page.
- When
- The article was published and last updated on September 29, 2026, at 11:39 IST.
- Where
- The exchange occurred through email and was discussed in a Reddit post.
- Why
- HR said the candidate did not sufficiently follow instructions or demonstrate attention to detail, initiative, and independent problem-solving.
Candidate’s Supporters
Recruitment Defenders
Who made the mistake?
Candidate’s Supporters
The candidate reasonably asked for clarification because the link did not appear to lead directly to the assessment.
Recruitment Defenders
The company’s instructions may have required applicants to use the careers page and find the assessment independently.
Was the rejection fair?
Candidate’s Supporters
Rejecting the candidate for asking a question was viewed as excessive, with some users accusing HR of refusing to acknowledge an error.
Recruitment Defenders
The recruiter maintained that following instructions, attention to detail, initiative, and independent navigation were part of the evaluation.
- Incident
- A candidate requested a correct assessment link from HR.
- Reported link behavior
- The provided link reportedly redirected to the company’s general careers page.
- HR’s explanation
- HR said the careers page was intentionally provided and contained instructions for proceeding.
- Reason for rejection
- The recruiter cited the candidate’s interaction as evidence of insufficient attention to detail and other skills.
- Online reaction
- Users debated whether the candidate made a reasonable request or failed to follow instructions.
- Source limitation
- News18 said the claims in the original user-generated post had not been independently verified.