Archive · 26 Dec 2025
Bombay HC Flags Misuse of Petitions to Sabotage IPOs
The Bombay High Court recently ruled in favor of SEBI's approval for WeWork India's IPO, highlighting concerns about the misuse of petitions to delay or sabotage IPOs.
Experts say that many petitions filed close to an IPO's launch raise questions about bad intentions.
These petitions often cite issues like disclosure lapses or shareholder classification problems.
The court found that some petitioners had improper motives and imposed costs on one such petitioner.
Industry participants suggest that corporate rivalry might be behind some of these petitions, with rivals using small shareholders as fronts.
There is a call for better safeguards to prevent such misuse of the legal system.
Bombay High Court upheld SEBI's approval for WeWork India's IPO, dismissing a petition as vexatious.
Experts note that petitions timed close to IPOs often raise concerns about bad intentions.
Grounds for such petitions include alleged disclosure lapses and shareholder classification issues.
The court imposed costs of Rs 1 lakh on a petitioner for serious impropriety.
Industry participants suggest corporate rivalry may drive some of these petitions.
- Who
- Bombay High Court, SEBI, WeWork India Management, Experts
- What
- Misuse of petitions to sabotage IPOs
- When
- Recent ruling, October IPO for WeWork India
- Where
- Bombay High Court, India
- Why
- To disrupt significant growth events like IPOs
- Company
- WeWork India Management
- Regulator
- Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Costs Imposed
- Rs 1 lakh
- Petition Timing
- Day before IPO opening