1 week ago

Calcutta High Court Upholds Divorce, Rejects Condonation Claim

Calcutta High Court Upholds Divorce, Rejects Condonation Claim
Cal HC upholds divorce decree, says stray incidents of living together not condonation of cruelty · theprint.in

The Calcutta High Court decided that a divorce granted to a husband should continue.

The couple had lived together for about five years.

They then stayed apart for 11 years.

Sometimes they lived together again during that separation.

The court said those short periods did not erase or forgive the cruelty it found.

The court also said the wife’s claims about dowry demands and a forced abortion were not properly supported.

Mediation did not help the couple settle their dispute.

The judges concluded that the marriage had broken down and that divorce was justified.

Key facts

Court
Calcutta High Court
Judges
Justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Supratim Bhattacharya
Original decree
Granted by a family court in December 2021
Period living together
About five years
Period separated
About 11 years
Mediation
Court-referred mediation failed
Key ruling
Occasional living together during separation did not amount to condonation of cruelty

Quotes

Calcutta High Court division bench

Division bench comprising Justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Supratim Bhattacharya

“We come to the conclusion that the appellant-wife is guilty of mental cruelty to the respondent-husband, thus furnishing a valid ground for divorce.”
theprint.in
“However, such liberal approach cannot be taken to such an extreme that it itself becomes a conservative dogma.”
theprint.in

Sources

Related news