Archive · 30 Aug 2026
Justice Bhuyan Says Questions Cannot Bring Student Punishment
Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said students should not get in trouble just for asking questions.
He explained that people in a democracy will not always think the same way.
Different opinions and beliefs should be accepted within the Constitution’s rules.
He said people should not have to give up their individuality.
Asking questions and disagreeing are important parts of a free society.
Dissent means expressing a different opinion from the majority.
Without room for dissent, freedom of speech would not be meaningful.
He said intolerance does not fit with constitutional values.
Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said students should not be punished for asking questions.
He emphasized that democratic societies must accommodate differences and dissent.
Bhuyan said intolerance is inconsistent with constitutional values.
He argued that people should retain their individuality rather than think alike.
He said freedom of expression and public participation require space for disagreement.
- Who
- Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, a Supreme Court judge.
- What
- He said students cannot be punished for asking questions and stressed the importance of tolerance, dissent and freedom of expression.
- Why
- He said democracy requires space for different opinions, beliefs and ways of viewing the world.
- Speaker
- Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
- Main issue
- Whether students should be punished for asking questions
- Core principle
- Tolerance of differing opinions
- Democratic value
- Space for dissent
- Constitutional idea
- A free society can include different opinions, beliefs and worldviews
- Individuality
- The Constitution does not require people to surrender their individuality