Archive · 8 Aug 2026
Option Strike Choice: Implied Volatility Versus Time Value
When you buy an option, part of its price slowly melts away every day, and that part is called time value.
Time value is made up of two pieces: how much time is left before the option expires, and implied volatility, which shows how much people think the price will move.
For options that expire on the same day, the time-left piece is exactly the same, so the real difference between strikes comes from implied volatility.
Strikes far above or below the current price usually have less time value, but people buying them in large numbers can push their implied volatility higher.
That is why picking a strike by time value is not always the same as picking one by implied volatility.
You can check this yourself by putting real option prices into a Black-Scholes-Merton calculator.
A good rule is to choose the strike with the lowest implied volatility among the three strikes closest to the current price, or the very next out-of-the-money strike.
This way, the option still has room to earn from price moves without losing too much to time decay.
The column answers an options trader's question on why strikes should be chosen based on implied volatility rather than time value.
Time value consists of time to expiry and implied volatility, and the time-to-expiry component is the same for all strikes of one expiry.
Strikes farther from the underlying price can have lower absolute time value yet higher implied volatility because demand affects a strike's implied volatility.
The article suggests verifying this using a Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model-based option calculator with inputs such as the Nifty Index price and option price.
The optimal approach is to choose the strike with the lowest implied volatility among the three strikes immediately above (calls) or below (puts) the underlying price, or the immediate OTM strike.
- Who
- The column's author, an options-training educator, responding to a query from an options trader.
- What
- A financial column explaining why option strikes should be chosen based on implied volatility rather than time value.
- When
- Published August 8, 2026.
- Where
- Not explicitly stated; the article references India's Nifty Index.
- Why
- To show that time value and implied volatility can point to different strikes, and to recommend buying the lowest-implied-volatility strike among nearby strikes to balance delta gains and time decay.
Time Value-Based Strike Choice
Implied Volatility-Based Strike Choice
How to rank option strikes
Time Value-Based Strike Choice
Pay as little time value as possible, since options are wasting assets and lower time value means lower decay-related loss.
Implied Volatility-Based Strike Choice
Rank by implied volatility instead: demand can push a low-time-value strike's implied volatility higher, so pick the strike with the lowest implied volatility among nearby strikes.
- Publication date
- August 8, 2026
- Core question
- Should option strikes be chosen by implied volatility or time value?
- Time value components
- Time to expiry and implied volatility
- Key insight
- Low absolute time value can coexist with high implied volatility due to demand for a strike
- Recommended strike
- Lowest implied volatility among three strikes immediately above (calls) or below (puts) the underlying price
- Alternative strategy
- Choose the immediate out-of-the-money (OTM) strike
- Verification tool
- Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model-based option calculator
- Reference market
- Nifty Index