Archive · 12 Dec 2025
YSRTUC Chief Accuses Chandrababu Naidu of Misusing Power
The leader of the YSR Trade Union Congress, Punuru Gautam Reddy, has accused the Chief Minister, N. Chandrababu Naidu, of using his power to close corruption cases against himself.
Reddy says that Naidu is threatening officials and manipulating the system to avoid legal trouble.
He mentioned a case called FiberNet, where he claims there was a lot of corruption and money was mishandled.
Reddy is very upset and says his party will fight in court to make sure Naidu is held responsible for his actions.
He believes the courts will not allow Naidu to get away with these things.
YSRTUC Chief Punuru Gautam Reddy accused CM N. Chandrababu Naidu of misusing state machinery to close corruption cases.
Reddy alleged that Naidu is threatening officials and pressuring them to shut down cases despite evidence of wrongdoing.
The FiberNet case was highlighted, with allegations of serious corruption and violations benefiting Vemuri Hariprasad.
Reddy claimed that the CID abandoned a probe backed by substantial evidence, while cases reopened during Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy’s tenure were pursued aggressively.
The YSRC plans to move the High Court and continue its legal fight, expressing confidence in the judiciary.
- Who
- Punuru Gautam Reddy (YSRTUC Chief) and N. Chandrababu Naidu (Chief Minister)
- What
- Accusations of misusing state machinery and threatening officials to close corruption cases
- When
- Not specified
- Where
- Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh
- Why
- Alleged financial offenses and violations in the FiberNet case
- Accused
- N. Chandrababu Naidu
- Accuser
- Punuru Gautam Reddy (YSRTUC Chief)
- Allegations
- Misusing state machinery, threatening officials, financial offenses
- Case in Question
- FiberNet case
- Alleged Irregularities
- Violations benefiting Vemuri Hariprasad, irregularities worth ₹114 crore
- Legal Action
- YSRC to move High Court
- Evidence
- Substantial evidence in FiberNet case
- Supreme Court Involvement
- Alleged violations of Supreme Court directions