Archive · 28 Sep 2025
Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Against Employer Undertakings
Imagine you were fired from your job, but the company offered it back if you promised to give up some of the money and benefits you were supposed to get.
A court has now said that these kinds of promises are not fair.
The court was looking at a case where a man was fired and then rehired, but he had to sign an agreement not to claim his past work experience.
The court said employers can’t force people to give up their rights just to keep their jobs, especially when the employees need the job to survive.
It means that if an employer makes you sign an agreement under pressure, it might not be valid.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled agreements forcing employees to give up legal benefits are invalid.
The case involved a municipal worker, Ranjit Singh, whose past service was initially disregarded.
Singh was rehired with a new employment letter and asked to forego back pay, impacting his benefits.
The court focused on if an employee can be denied service rights based on an employer's dictate.
The court stated such undertakings are exploitative and against constitutional rights.
- Who
- The Punjab and Haryana High Court, Ranjit Singh and the Municipal Council of Khanna.
- What
- The Court ruled that agreements requiring employees to relinquish their legal benefits are invalid.
- When
- Ruling issued on September 25.
- Where
- Punjab and Haryana High Court.
- Why
- To protect workers’ rights against unfair employer tactics and exploitation.
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Case
- Ranjit Singh vs. Municipal Council, Khanna
- Ruling Date
- September 25
- Judge
- Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
- Key Issue
- Validity of employee undertakings
- Legal Basis
- Indian Contract Act (1872)