Politics · Saudi Arabia · 1 day ago
Saudi court cancels salary deductions from visually impaired employee
A court in Medina, Saudi Arabia, cancelled salary deductions imposed on a visually impaired employee.
His employer had docked his pay because he did not record attendance on a fingerprint device.
The employee said his visual impairment made repeated trips to the device difficult, and his supervisor confirmed he attended work regularly.
The court found that missing fingerprint records did not prove he was absent or neglecting his duties.
It also noted that the employer had previously excused him from using the system, and an appeals court upheld the decision to cancel the deductions.
The ruling highlights that attendance systems should take a worker’s circumstances into account, and the Board of Grievances published it as part of efforts to explain legal protections for people with disabilities.
Saudi Arabia’s Administrative Court in Medina annulled salary deductions imposed on a visually impaired employee for not registering attendance by fingerprint.
The court found that failure to use the fingerprint device did not establish that he was absent or negligent.
His employer had previously accepted his excuse and exempted him from the fingerprint system because of his health circumstances.
The Administrative Court of Appeal upheld the ruling.
The employee worked as a central operator and said repeated trips to the fingerprint device were difficult because of his visual impairment.
- Who
- A visually impaired employee who worked as a central operator.
- What
- A court annulled salary deductions imposed for not registering attendance by fingerprint, and the appeal court upheld the ruling.
- When
- The ruling’s publication was reported on October 12, 2026. The date of the ruling is not stated.
- Where
- Medina, Saudi Arabia.
- Why
- The court found that missing a fingerprint record did not prove absence or negligence, and that the employer had previously exempted him from the system.
This story does not have two clearly opposing sides.
The employee sought to cancel salary deductions, citing difficulty reaching the fingerprint device because of his visual impairment.
The Administrative Court in Medina annulled the deductions, finding that the missing fingerprint record did not prove absence or negligence.
The Administrative Court of Appeal upheld the ruling.
Okaz reported that the Board of Grievances had published the ruling.
- Employee’s job
- Central operator
- Court of first instance
- Administrative Court in Medina
- Appeal outcome
- The Administrative Court of Appeal upheld the ruling
- Publication date
- October 12, 2026
- Attendance system
- Fingerprint device
What people are saying
the failure to prove his attendance through the fingerprint does not imply his absence or negligence











